Why Are Herbal Remedies Taken for 6–9 Weeks in Clinical Trials? Understanding Safety and Toxicity

 

Herbal remedies have been used for centuries, but modern clinical trials require scientific validation of their efficacy and safety . One common observation in these trials is that herbal treatments are often administered for 6 to 9 weeks , yet they still show no toxicity to vital organs.

Why is this timeframe chosen? What scientific factors support its safety? Let's explore the reasons behind this duration in clinical studies.

---

1. Pharmacokinetics and Herb Metabolism

Pharmacokinetics refers to how a substance is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. Unlike synthetic drugs, herbal compounds often require time to reach steady-state concentrations , where the rate of intake matches the rate of elimination.

• Bioactive compounds may need time to accumulate before their effects become noticeable.
• A 6 to 9-week period allows researchers to observe how these compounds are metabolized and eliminated.
• This timeframe ensures that the half-life and systemic exposure of the herbal remedy are well understood.

---

2. Subchronic Toxicity Assessment

Toxicity studies are categorized based on duration:

• A 6 to 9-week study falls under subchronic toxicity assessment , which is designed to detect potential damage to organs such as the liver, kidneys, and blood systems .
• This period minimizes prolonged risk to participants while still providing valuable data on safety.
• Guidelines from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) suggest that subchronic studies (28 to 90 days) are suitable for evaluating toxicity ( OECD, 2008 ).

---

3. Physiological Adaptation to Herbal Remedies

Unlike synthetic drugs that often act rapidly , herbal remedies work by modulating physiological pathways over time.

• They influence systems such as immune responses, enzyme activity, and receptor regulation .
• A few weeks allow the body to adjust and exhibit measurable responses .
• This is particularly relevant for herbs used in metabolic conditions like diabetes, hypertension, or lipid disorders .

A 6–9 week period ensures that researchers can observe these adaptive changes without rushing conclusions.

---

4. Traditional and Empirical Evidence

Herbal medicine has a long history of use , and many remedies have anecdotal records of safety. Researchers use:

• Traditional medicinal knowledge to set study durations.
• Empirical evidence from past studies to estimate how long herbal treatments should be taken.
• Observational data from herbal use in communities to support short-term safety assessments.

This historical perspective supports the scientific rationale for choosing a 6–9 week period in modern trials.

---

5. Lack of Accumulation of Toxic Metabolites

Many synthetic drugs have long half-lives or toxic metabolites that accumulate in the body , potentially causing harm over time. However, many herbs contain natural compounds like polyphenols, flavonoids, and alkaloids that:

• Are readily metabolized and excreted from the body.
• Do not accumulate to dangerous levels in short-term studies.
• If toxicity does not appear within 6–9 weeks , it is unlikely to occur unless the herb is used for much longer periods.

However, long-term safety studies are still necessary for chronic use.

---

6. Organ Safety in Herbal Clinical Trials

A major reason why herbal studies report no toxicity is due to regular biomarker monitoring . Clinical trials frequently test:

• Liver function (ALT, AST, ALP levels).
• Kidney function (Creatinine, Urea levels).
• Hematological parameters (Red blood cells, White blood cells, Platelets).

As long as these biomarkers remain within normal ranges throughout the 6–9 week study, it suggests that the herbal remedy is safe for short-term use .

For example, a 90-day subchronic toxicity study on a polyherbal formulation found no adverse effects on liver and kidney function ( Adeoye et al., 2021 ).

---

Conclusion

The 6–9 week duration in herbal clinical trials is not random —it is based on scientific reasoning that ensures both therapeutic effects and short-term safety can be assessed.

Key Takeaways:

✔ This timeframe allows herbs to reach steady-state concentrations in the body.
✔ Subchronic toxicity assessments can identify potential organ damage early.
✔ Herbs often require time to show physiological effects.
✔ Historical and empirical evidence supports these study durations.
✔ Lack of toxic metabolite accumulation contributes to safety.
✔ Organ function is carefully monitored throughout clinical trials.

However, long-term safety requires extended studies , typically lasting several months to years , to confirm that chronic toxicity does not occur .

References:

1. OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals – Repeated Dose 90-day Oral Toxicity Study (2008). Link .
2. Adeoye, MO, et al. (2021). “Subchronic Toxicity Study of a Polyherbal Formulation.” Journal of Ethnopharmacology . Link .